The plans show how a coastal land has developed into a coastal park.
The maps illustrate some changes to a coastal land into a coastal park.
Overall, there will be several transformations made to the coastal land after development compared to before development. Numerous addition of different green factors and entertainment facilities, as well as the removal of the existing farming builldings, animals and unused land.
As can be seen from the maps, before development, there were unused land and animals shelters on the West side, whereas the East side of the coastal land was agricultural land. Between these constructions were farm buildings. This area is opposite the cliffs leading directly to the beach and sea.
Turning to the other features, after development, the unused land and the animal inhabited area on the West side will be demolished and replaced by the lake. A new car park will be constructed on the original site of the farm buildings. Further developments were the construction of a small coffee behind a new car park, while, trees will be planted along the path to provide more shade and quality air. The agricultural land on the East side will also be refurbished into the woods, connected with a small coffee shop and a new car park via a footpath. At the bottom of the map, steps will be added to the cliffs to allow more visitors to the beach.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93693693694 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8092077896 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8556987637 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24648431378 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106146950937 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133031879241 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218785381424 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147195687659 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93693693694 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8092077896 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8556987637 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24648431378 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106146950937 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133031879241 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218785381424 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147195687659 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.