The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage of American ate in fast food restaurant in three difference years.
Overall, it is clear that almost people went to fast food restaurant from once a week to once or twice a month during a preiod, while there are small percentage of those ate everyday.
In 2003, over 30% of Americans usually ate fast food at reataurants once a week. This figure reached a peak at 33% in 2006, compared with the same percenatge of those ate once or twice a month in 2013. The proportion of people frequent ate in fast doof restaurants a few times a year lowest in 2003 with 13% and went up by 2% in 2013.
There was slightly decreased in the number of people went to fast food restaurant everyday throughout period, from merely 4% in 2003 to 3% in both 2006 and 2013. The proportion of people never ate fast food in restaurants showed the similar trend, declined by 1% from 5% in 2003. The figure for people ate severals times a week showed a fluctuation, from 17% in 2003 increased to 20% before declining to 16% in final year.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ate' or 'those ates'?
Suggestion: this ate; those ates
...od, while there are small percentage of those ate everyday. In 2003, over 30% of America...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...there are small percentage of those ate everyday. In 2003, over 30% of Americans usuall...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ate' or 'those ates'?
Suggestion: this ate; those ates
...6, compared with the same percenatge of those ate once or twice a month in 2013. The prop...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45595854922 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5236299025 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3374253192 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289170469066 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153018999543 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595393669409 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18633896079 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468647567596 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.