The pie chart conveys the total of electricity units produced in France and Australia between 1980 and 2000 categorized by several source of energies.
# IELTS TASK 1: PIE CHART
.jpeg){kind=link}
The pie chart conveys the total of electricity units produced in France and Australia between 1980 and 2000 categorized by several source of energies.
Overall, while electricities fueled by coal in Australia rose steeply, dominating the production, in France, most electricity units were generated by natural gas eventually. However, electricities using crude oil decreased in both nations. (31)
In 1980, electricity in Australia are dominated by coal energy which accounted for half of the total production, while those generated by petroleum became the least produced units. Whilst, the most-consumed energies for electricities in France were petroleum and natural gas which accounted for 25 each. However, France’s oil energy used in electricity was twice as higher as Australia's.
In the following 20 years, Australia held their coal and hydropower energy jumped by almost triple and double, respectively. Meanwhile, natural gas and fossil fuel were the least used energy for electricity. In France, nuclear power skyrocketed, dominating nearly 75% of total units. The use of natural gas and hydropower was only 2%, becoming the least favorite energy at the end of the year.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or Disagree 61
- Car drivers and cyclists share the same roads and this can cause problems for both of them Why is this the case What measures can be taken to solve these problems 73
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people around the world still hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 67
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for the three countries between 2007 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun source seems to be countable; consider using: 'several sources'.
Suggestion: several sources
...ia between 1980 and 2000 categorized by several source of energies. Overall, while electri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 374, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...used in electricity was twice as higher as Australias. In the following 20 year...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 7.00529100529 4.92477711251 142% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 13.3938837491 2.65546596893 504% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 113.885732206 43.030603864 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 132.4 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362908450658 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108568231398 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779364866523 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209861595888 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.284862580353 0.0819641961636 348% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 10.3012195122 135% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 23.38 11.4140731707 205% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.