Nowadays, many universities plan to develop a new research center. Some people think business research is the best but some people think agriculture is the efficient one. I think the agriculture center is good for the country. I will tell you three reasons; develop country, publicity, the food problem
First, agriculture research centers can develop the country very much. Most countries build so many business centers to make their country rich and their economy grow. Therefore, they ignore the environment and claim only the business research center. However, the agriculture center can trade with other countries and employment is combined, it can reduce poverty and boost economic growth.
Second, the university should consider publicity. The company establishes a business center at its own expense, so they can pursue their personal profit. However, universities should be considered public first because universities are maintained with tax by the public.
Last, the food problem is so serious. These Days, the crops are not growing well due to environmental pollution and labor shortages. For example, the U.S., which is the No. 1 economy, has many starving people because of the lack of food. Therefore, we have to reduce the price of food by producing a lot of food. I think the food problem will become more serious in the future, so I think the university should build more agriculture research centers.
This is why I think the agriculture center is better than the business center. Business centers are good, but what is needed right now is the agriculture center. I hope there will be more centers like this, and then more social development.
- Every generation of people is different in important ways How is your generation different from your parents generation Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 100
- TOEFL integrated Question the extinction of Steller s sea cow 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 87
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 78
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lop country, publicity, the food problem First, agriculture research centers can ...
^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter. However, the agriculture center can trade with other countries and employmen...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is, and then more social development.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 52.1666666667 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 269.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2750929368 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71085040909 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0902449227 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8333333333 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9444444444 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420357269881 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13720875795 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102764134012 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230189770424 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124782358234 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lop country, publicity, the food problem First, agriculture research centers can ...
^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter. However, the agriculture center can trade with other countries and employmen...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is, and then more social development.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 52.1666666667 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 269.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2750929368 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71085040909 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0902449227 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8333333333 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9444444444 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420357269881 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13720875795 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102764134012 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230189770424 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124782358234 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.