The pie chart below shows information about different types of pollutants entering in a particular area of ocean in 1997 and 2007
The pie charts illustrate five different kinds of contaminants entering in one particular area of ocean in two years, namely 1997 and 2007.
In general, there were a noticeable decrease in the proportion of trash, agriculture runoff, and sewage entering in this area, while an upward trend can be seen if we look at the figures for oil and air pollution. It is also clear that the figure for trash was the highest among five types of pollutants in 1997; however, that for oil was larger than for any other in 2007.
At the beginning of the period, 42% of pollutants that entered in this area of the ocean was trash, compared to only 25% of agriculture runoff. Over the following 10 years, this area of ocean saw the percentage of trash drop sharply, to 15%. Furthermore, Agriculture runoff followed a similar trend to that of trash, with figures decreasing to 8%.
In 1997, the proportion of sewage and oil stood at the same level, while the figure for air pollution was lower, at 3% respectively. After 10 years, the percentage of oil entering in one particular area of the ocean rose considerably, reaching a peak of 52%. In addition, the proportion of air pollution entering in this area climbed to 15%; however, that for sewage declined to 8%
- The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelbey between 1780 and 2000 78
- The charts below show the percentage of working time in office spent on different tasks in the UK 1990 and 2000 67
- The pie chart shows different types of transport crossing the bridge in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 67
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Pentland 67
- the maps below show the changes of the community centre 10 years ago and at present 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71689497717 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70601019783 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1758286703 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264824273905 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124837516376 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106450360108 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199062672273 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116560714877 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.