Many people in the music business feel that illegal music sites on the internet are a serious threat to the industry and more should be done to prevent them from operating. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is considered by many in the market that online music piracy threatens the life of music industry and needs to be mitigated. While I agree with this notion as it steals royalties from the artist and kills creativity in the long run.
Music piracy mostly leads to artist royalty loss, discouraging future talents from producing high-quality music. Simply put, youngsters do not consider being a musician a promising job due to the unstable payment received given to piracy issues. According to the journal published by Yale in 2019 reveals that 80% of music department students do not consider being a musician as their source of income due to the results that show 20% of the US singers received 50% fewer royalties for the past decade due to the emerging of online piracy. Thus, royalty loss leads to decreasing future musician talents.
Decreasing creativity levels among musicians happen due to piracy issues, deteriorating the public’s interest in music. As the piracy rate increases, musicians feel underappreciated, which causes a low quality of work. For instance, a survey conducted by the Indonesia Ministry of economic creative reveals a plummet in local music’s online purchases in 2019. One of the reasons was the shifting of people’s interest from local music to western music as they consider the latter has better quality. After being investigated, local online music piracy jumped by more than double in the last decade in Indonesia, and 3/5 of local musicians felt underappreciated. Hence, piracy discourages local musicians from producing good quality music.
To conclude, royalty loss and creativity shortage are the two significant impacts of online music piracy. It is agreed that this should be soon mitigated as being a menace to the sustainability of the industry. Hence, creating robust law enforcement is necessary.
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the city The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- Many parents think that it is good to help children in their homework but others think parents should not do that and it is their own duty Discuss both and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1989 to 2007 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28378378378 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89365947496 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9273585483 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219462826986 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820019134648 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562250375209 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154167830287 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473325842493 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28378378378 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89365947496 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9273585483 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219462826986 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820019134648 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562250375209 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154167830287 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473325842493 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.