The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990, the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000.
The tabular data depicts how many inhabitants lived in three distinct cities, in 1990 and 2000 ,as well as the estimated population for 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that while the population of Sao Paulo and Jakarta increased between 1990 and 2000, there was a decline in the population of Shanghai. Notably, Sao Paulo remained the most populous city during the period shown.
First of all, in 1990, Sao Paulo recorded the highest population whereas Jakarta had the least with figures of 15 million and 9.5 million respectively. Although Sao Paulo’s population was predicted to reach 24 million by 2000, it only rose to 18 million. Similarly, a mammoth increase was observed in Jakarta's population reaching 17.5 million a decade later which was more than the predicted figures of 14 million.
On the other hand, there were 13.5 million people living in Shanghai in 1990 and the population was expected to experience significant growth over the next decade. However, in reality, it dropped to 12.5 million, instead of the forecasted rise to 17 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-18 | Jocelyn | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | yashu_5219 | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Kudrat | 76 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | kaur randhawa | 82 | view |
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
- In some countries people move abroad for their work They have to leave their family and friends Do you think the benefits of this outweigh drawbacks 73
- Providing a national system in a country where the unemployed receive a regular payment only encourages people not to seek work and puts an unreasonable strain on a country s financial resources Discuss this statement and give your opinion 78
- The best way to solve the traffic congestion in city is to provide free public transport for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many people today use their phone for sending text than talking What are the reasons for this Are there more advantages or disadvantages 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... three distinct cities, in 1990 and 2000 ,as well as the estimated population for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, well, whereas, while, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6689079017 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8440919345 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289281936655 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142026139605 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874087573091 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201101500093 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865169250836 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.