The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps depict changes that took place in the road access to a city hospital between 2007 and 2010
Overall, a comparison between the two maps reveals a shift in the surroundings from a simple area to a well-organized zone.
Looking at the maps, it is noticeable that all the infrastructures in the area were innovated with complicated designs. Along two sides of Hospital Rd, the bus stations were removed to make way for a widened bus station and the exclusive staff car park, which previously shared the place with 3 bus stations. Along the Hospital Rd, two intersections with City Road and Ring Road were converted, with two new roundabouts being erected. In addition, two pathways were constructed from the roundabouts, heading to a new bus station located to the west of Hospital Rd. The former car park in 2007 was doubled, with the development of a separate public car park adjacent to Ring Road and to the east of the city hospital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 74
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 82
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7743902439 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84961016777 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1117010073 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.6 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214761897062 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118044461947 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894691356182 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176600002684 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08689474726 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7743902439 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84961016777 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1117010073 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.6 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214761897062 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118044461947 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894691356182 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176600002684 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08689474726 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.