ome people believe that it’s good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe some information is too important/valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Nowadays, it is common belief that information in scientific research, business and academic fields should be shared freely and as much as possible. However, from my perspective, not all information ought to be viewed freely since there is some data that is too invaluable and crucial.
On the one hand, it is recommended that humans should share their knowledge on academic fields with others. Firstly, by acquiring these expertise , people can broaden their knowledge. For instance, with the development of the Internet and social media sites, numerous people who have struggles with their studying can solve their questions with just a click of a mouse. Secondly, when one shares his or her research with others, he or she might have a chance to get feedback on his or her work. Thus, this individual can make improvements on their works by listening to constructive advice.
On the other hand, I agree that there is some data that is too crucial and invaluable to be shared without any fee. First of all, should academic knowledge be encouraged to be spread free, it could lead to a rise in ownership violation. For example, on the grounds that information is given for free, a lot of people can be incited to copy the works of other scientists and claim them as their own. Moreover, charging a fee is a means to show gratitude to an individual or teams for their contribution and hard work. Secondly, there is some data that is too dangerous to be known. For instance, if information about nuclear bombs or biological weapons is known, it may result in an outbreak of war, thus leading to chaoses around the world.
To sum up, while it is beneficial that people share knowledge with others, it is evident that some of the information should be kept in the dark because of their importance or the threats they might pose if known.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-02 | tranthiphuongthao1986 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behavior What is your opinion 56
- ome people believe that it s good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe some information is too important valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behavior What s your opinion 84
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What s your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this expertise' or 'these expertises'?
Suggestion: this expertise; these expertises
...elds with others. Firstly, by acquiring these expertise , people can broaden their knowledge. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. Firstly, by acquiring these expertise , people can broaden their knowledge. For...
^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstructive advice. On the other hand, I agree that there is some data that is ...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...owledge with others, it is evident that some of the information should be kept in the dark ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79245283019 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68452060488 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5012916348 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25717128001 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972061734047 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856534060388 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186679203591 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10157456169 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.