Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind, waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal, oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is assume that the implementation of environmentally and friendly energy resources like wind, waves, and sun are costly. This is aimed to reduce dependence society on fossil fuel sources such as coal, oil and gas as a power to city and transportation system. While this statement leads to a great deal of controversy, I would argue that alternative energy sources basically require more money to build its plants. This contrasts to scientists who have developed plenty of research to create these forms of energy more efficient and it can generate much more power for the world’s inhabitants needs.
Admittedly, a cleaner and greener alternative power consumes more money, since it is inexpensive to run, but high-priced to construct its infrastructure. In Britain, for instance, electricity from wind costs twice as much as that from conventional sources like coal, and nearly all the wind turbines are produced by a single firm. This, in a fact, is vulnerable to change the cost of energy consumption in the capital city. As a result, the government remains to extend the life of fossil resources to meet society’s energy needs.
Standing in contrast, the vast number of the renewable energy resources must be expanded to diminish reliance on fossil fuels even though it digs deep to fund them. The main reason for this is that an enormous number of experts are continuing to research newer and better forms of energy. To exemplify, a new water battery which is being created at MIT will be able to power a car for hundreds of miles. Next, natural power stations provide more powerful energy. A study found that the use of photovoltaic cell for solar power plant could supply energy for more than one billion people by 2020 and 26 percent of global energy introduces by 2040. Therefore, this is sustainable and a viable solution in terms of producing power to cities and transport sector.
The aforementioned evidence reveals that alternative power sources are important to develop. It can also be seen that although the governments may totally spend more cost to construct alternative power plants, the citizens will obtain benefits from natural reserves for a long-term need.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-08 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
2020-10-09 | milad_salehi2002 | 73 | view |
2015-09-02 | broerjuang | 79 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the level of education of Bulgarian people who wanted to go and live in another country in 2002 2006 and 2008 57
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location 82
- Social network has impact to our knowledge. 58
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the seaside of Templeteon between 1990 and 2005 50
- Many people join distance learning programs study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits as attending colleges or universities does Do you agree or disagree 94
It is assume that
It is assumed that
plenty of research to create these forms of energy more efficient
plenty of researches to create these forms of energy more efficiently
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1785 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.945 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.787 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.562 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.81 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.512 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.073 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5