Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind, waves, and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal, oil, and gas that we use to power our cities and transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Displacing fossil fuels with the renewable energy sources to power regional electricity requires big-budget and complex. Personally, I opine the same perspective for reasonable points which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
First of all, it is obvious that despite the high cost of renewable energy, the sustainability of natural power usage can be passed through generations to come. Considering high demand of fossil fuel, Copenhagen has implemented SDG’s policy through Combine Heat and Power Production (CHP) plant, in the long run, a community almost spends zero electricity bill resulting in greater social welfare. Moreover, both factories and society have increased an intense awareness of effective decarbonization action to support eco-friendly energy use. Regarding severe air pollution exposure, all electric Dutch trains are now 100% powered by wind turbine.
Conversely, this conveys some positives that the expansion of renewable electricity capacity leads to high power prices, owing primarily to energy specific taxes. It has energy segmentation functions that hardly supply public facilities along with residents’ energy needs. Subsequently, Kuwait and Oman has been the heavily oil consumers until today. Furthermore, relying much on fossil fuel relates to the complexity of green energy systems using transformation and conversion process. Obviously, current energy has been securely used for years, unlike Fukushima nuclear plant. Following greatest risk happened, trial and error may suffer citizens from deep trauma of its disasters.
To conclude, it seems to me that relying on fossil fuel rather than renewable energy is worth implementing because of several drawbacks of alternative sources, including huge allocation of national budget and machine complexity process. This is as long as such energy can meet everlasting for human time-scale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-08 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | akmalfikri1 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | milad_salehi2002 | 73 | view |
| 2015-09-02 | broerjuang | 79 | view |
- Many first year university students discover after they have started their course that their chosen subjects do not suit them Why does this happen What can be done to ensure that students can choose a suitable subject 90
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many cities planners tend to arrange shops schools offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many companies sponsor sports to advertise their products or service What advantages and disadvantages does this bring for the teams and individuals that these companies sponsor 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85507246377 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94896376946 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.710144927536 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3868527494 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177548025487 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576490343504 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340078235189 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10088681697 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029825243483 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.