Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air
pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.
It is a common belief that no-care days are a plausible solution to mitigate air pollution.
However, there is a more persuasive argument that there are more radical remedies to
preserve the atmosphere.
On the one hand, people who support days when cars are banned from circulating have
their own compelling rationales. To begin with, it is undoubted that private cars are a
proximate cause of contamination. Therefore, prohibiting cars will lower traffic density,
which is analogous to less greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. Otherwise
stated, no-car days are an approach to directly combat choking air and deal with air
pollution.
On the other hand, there are also many measures to enhance the air quality. Government
is recommended to implement an odd-even rationing policy, in which cars are only
allowed to use on some specific days in a week depending on plate number. On the days
that their vehicles are banned, the owners are compelled to use public transportations.
This policy has the same impact as car-free days on reducing emissions. Besides,
fostering production and use of electric cars could be the most plausible method. Unlike
forbidding cars, this resolution not only comprises the convenience that cars bring to us
but also contributes to air quality.
To sum up, while it is apparent that no-car days are an effective approach to air pollution,
it is undeniable that there are many other remedies. On balance, instead of interdicting
cars, I support the other policies, which not only curb pollution but also ameliorate the
shortcomings of car-free days
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 | minminnt | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Gulinura | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | khanhngoc2307 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | loc nguyen | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al remedies to preserve the atmosphere. On the one hand, people who support days...
^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. Otherwise stated, no-car days are an approach to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32684824903 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93805497353 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571984435798 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.371656548 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 4.38176352705 456% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243035316419 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845595140358 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510583740809 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678902853662 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514529191015 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.