Behaviour in schools is getting worse. Explain the causes and effects of this problem and suggest some possible solutions.
The poor behavior of students in class is a controversial issue in today's education industry. This trend has been influenced by teaching methods, personalities, and student numbers, all of which need to be addressed with care.
Outdated teaching techniques are one of the factors that cause disruptive behaviors in the classroom. Today's youngers has grown up using technological devices such as smartphones and tablets, accessing and providing information at the touch of a button. On the contrary, many teachers give lectures with whiteboards and pens, which makes students bored, leading to a lack of seriousness and disorder. Schools need to invest money to buy modern technology equipment and retrain teachers to be able to teach content in a more engaging way. If students are interested in the content of the lesson, they will cause less trouble, even limiting the problem of cheating on the test because of a lack of knowledge.
Another major cause of bad behavior in the classroom is class size. Specifically, in a class in Vietnam, there are usually more than 40 students, so almost no teacher can afford to teach. Everyone gets the attention they need. Therefore, children who cannot complete a certain task will start misbehaving just because they feel uncomfortable. Furthermore, the more students there are in a room, the more likely a person wants to attract attention by behaving badly or differently. To solve this problem requires government legislation to limit class sizes to around 25 on average. Additionally, money should be invested in building more schools to reduce overcrowding.
In conclusion, bad behavior in schools often stems from the fact that classrooms contain too many people and too little modern equipment. The only way to end this problem is until schools modernize their teaching techniques and the government builds more schools until the problem is completely resolved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-18 | qnhci | view | |
| 2022-06-17 | cleee | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | Luisjackiet | 80 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Hanabi | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-27 | Khanh_Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Nowadays most people are moving and living in big cities Why is this happening Is this trend good or bad 89
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Give reasons 78
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 56
- Although families have influence on a children s development factors outside the home play a bigger part in their lives nowadays To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which need to be addressed with care. Outdated teaching techniques are one of ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e test because of a lack of knowledge. Another major cause of bad behavior in t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g more schools to reduce overcrowding. In conclusion, bad behavior in schools o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30819672131 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9532157849 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596721311475 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6094279063 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123816125117 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403494811031 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430125718804 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764702889016 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03905602712 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which need to be addressed with care. Outdated teaching techniques are one of ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e test because of a lack of knowledge. Another major cause of bad behavior in t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g more schools to reduce overcrowding. In conclusion, bad behavior in schools o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30819672131 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9532157849 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596721311475 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6094279063 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123816125117 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403494811031 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430125718804 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764702889016 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03905602712 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.