All large companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community. Do
you agree or disagree?
It has been greatly discussed that large corporations should be responsible for building
infrastructures for sports and social purposes for the local community. Even though, this
notion is appealing as it helps large firms to give back to the community, I believe that this
should not solely be the responsible of large companies.
The rationale for having large companies to build sport infrastructures and social amenities
and facilities for the local community stems from the notion that as the companies operate,
they hold accountable for minimising their impact to the local community. Thus, building
sports and social amenities is deemed crucial for a sustainable development of the community
in the long run. Additionally, sports and social infrastructures are considered as lucrative
features for residents to consider living in one community to another.
On the contrary, I firmly believe that the responsibility of building a feasible living
community by creating sports and social facilities is not a sole duty of large companies but
rather, requires substantial resources and approvals from the local authorities as well. To
begin with, the local authority is responsible for the operation of a business, from scratch, as
it requires a tedious process of paperwork before any business commences. Therefore, as the
governing bodies for the community, they should be held accountable too. Additionally,
should large companies build any facilities regardless of its purposes, local authority
permissions are required. Moreover, without any rewarding or beneficial incentives, large
firms do not have sufficient motivations to give back to the community. For instance, local
community can provide incentive for companies by reducing its cost of operation through
discount on resources used such as land rental.
In conclusion, in building a feasibly sustainable community, large firms should provide
sports and other social infrastructures as a way of giving back . However, this also requires
substantial efforts from the local authority in term of facilitating and approving the process of
building the aforementioned amenities and providing motivations through incentives for large
firms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-01 | duckymomokhongphailarapper | 61 | view |
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
- All large companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community Do you agree or disagree 61
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What way is the most effective 89
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 26, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... infrastructures as a way of giving back . However, this also requires substantia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82424242424 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22401087587 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9439882697 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.846153846 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41829335988 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170681364801 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824280045941 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127803771793 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922767867461 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.