The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles.
The picture elucidates how the process of recycling used glass bottles through three consecutive stages.
In general, the glass bottles are stored in the collection point before being transported to the factory to undergo the processes of becoming new ones.
Initially, the used glass bottles are compiled at the collection points and fetched using a vehicle to the factory. Before being put into the factory, the bottles are cleaned with high-pressure water and then classified based on their colour, whether they are clear, green, or brown. Then the bottles undertake a process in the factory to turn the glass into pieces.
Afterwards, the piece of glass is heated in a burning furnace consisting of more than 600 degrees Celcius. After being liquidised, it is then shaped using a glass mould along with the new glass liquid to become the new glass bottle. Finally, after forming a solid shape of the new glass bottle, it is ready to distribute widely through supermarkets.
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
- Many people in the music business feel that illegal music sites on the internet are a serious threat to the industry and more should be done to prevent them from operating To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 62
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social issues To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13664596273 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61101641815 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3167434715 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28140035735 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137889230766 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975982882079 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198625734983 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886635721738 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.