The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period.
The given bar charts provide a comparison of the expenditure for a variety of entertaining models in three different nations over a five-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that a major of people in these three countries prefer paying for publishing forms and televisions rather than others. Noticeably, the spending on all entertaining models witnessed an upward trend over the years shown.
According to the data from 1995, it is obvious that the disbursement for television in Asia and Europe was merely under $50 billion while the amount of money allocated for this form in the United States was around $60 billion. Subsequently, the spending on publishing in the US was more than 3 times when compared with the other nations. Next, the purchasing of video and cinema in these three nations had the same pattern and the money used for music in the US and Europe was up to 2 times of Asia.
Moving to the statistical index in a diagram in the year 2000, it is conspicuous that the expenditure on television form in these three countries made a two-fold jump after 5 years. Following that, the sales in publishing in Asia and Europe slightly increased by no more than $15 billion dollars whereas this number in the US raised by more than $20 billion. While the spending on music in Europe was unchanged, its form in two other nations was doubled. Finally, revenue for cinema and video experienced a gentle increment throughout the period in all nations.
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China 73
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of the two dinners 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area in Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 92
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83003952569 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76248110368 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517786561265 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8398042164 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.2 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202786886494 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843601484231 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663565250014 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140898211905 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059679237259 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83003952569 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76248110368 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517786561265 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8398042164 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.2 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202786886494 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843601484231 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663565250014 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140898211905 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059679237259 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.