The maps give information about a university sports court.
The given map sheds lights on the redevelopment of a university sporting facility since 1990.
As can be seen from the map, the whole court has gone through a remarkable transformation, the most noticeable of which is the emergence of a variety of new facilities.
The North-East area witnessed the least renovation with just the conversion of the outdoor pool into an indoor facility while the cafe and receptionist have remained unchanged since 1990. On the flip side, the changing room, which was originally located in the center of the area has been expanded and made it way towards the East at the moment, along with the existence of a brand new fitness center in the same area, in place of the tennis court.
Considering the West side, trees in the park were chopped down in order to make room for a new basketball court. The map also illustrates the disappearance of the car park to give way for the tennis facility, which has been doubled in size compared to its in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | lalo | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | Feresew | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view |
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
- The diagram below shows the design for a wind turbine and its location 78
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6936416185 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71954107132 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2322679674 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167325391443 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846862478319 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706716724416 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113699355009 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702706335764 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.