Developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice is needed? Discuss.
These years, opinions diverge regarding whether financial help from international organizations or practical aid and advice is more vital for third-world countries. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and give my own opinion on why I am inclined to support the former.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the provision of money from multinational organizations offer more benefits to developing countries. The main reason for believing this is that these countries need the assistance of finance to upgrade the industry and infrastructure. This leads to the fact that modern machines and equipment are invested to enhance the productivity of the manufacturing process. In other words, the construction of facilities and systems make a great contribution to the betterment of living standards in residential areas. One compelling example of this is that railway stations are established for the purpose of making traveling of residents to other places easier. In addition, such help creates more job opportunities for the unemployed. If they have more job prospects, their income might significantly increase, thereby boosting their quality of life.
Nevertheless, it is possible to make the opposing case . It is often argued that practical aid and advice from these organizations are more imperative. Specifically, economically disadvantaged nations are supplied with professionals who are likely to devise solutions to certain problems. One convincing illustration here is that medical specialists offer drastic measures to curb the spread of diseases including african swine fever. A second point is that students and young people are possibly provided a chance to get higher education from foreign associations. People often have this opinion because adequately educated pupils would have more potential careers and awareness of their role in fostering the development of their own regions.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that monetary resources of intercontinental groups are more essential for underprivileged states than practical support and advice . This is because the industry and infrastructure can be improved and the residents could receive more suitable jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-22 | hahahahahah | 89 | view |
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice is needed Discuss 89
- TOPIC 1 Some people think that it is more effective for students in studying in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...it is possible to make the opposing case . It is often argued that practical aid a...
^^
Line 6, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...states than practical support and advice . This is because the industry and infras...
^^
Line 6, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dents could receive more suitable jobs.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60458452722 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20933057838 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590257879656 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6333974975 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202598604389 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554547927937 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801985169902 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114011278057 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543866577741 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.