The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the main roots why teenagers use their phones asking in surveys in an African country over the period of four years, starting in 2016.
It is noticeable that there was a change slightly in four various reasons. However, almost teenagers use phones for social networking purposes throughout the time frame.
In 2016, the use of social networks accounted for precisely half, after which it saw a negligible change before ending the period at 56%. Besides, the retail of digital cameras stayed steadily at 15% for one year and then increased gradually with a final growth of 20%.
By contrast, in 2016 the proportion of using phones for calls stood at exact tithe, with a subsequent rise to peak at 13% in 2017 and witnessed a twofold decrease during the given period. Nevertheless, the retail email was the one which had the biggest drop. The number of teenagers who used it fell forever until remained four-fifths in 2019 compared to that in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | pttd.duong@gmail.com | view | |
| 2023-04-21 | pttd.duong@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | Md Mazedul Islam | 73 | view |
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days To what extent do you think the advantages of 56
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media Do you think it is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 84
- Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment Do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90303030303 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53282581548 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0911735183 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247664573338 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990991549948 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955942638701 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158507027483 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101526173724 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90303030303 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53282581548 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0911735183 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247664573338 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990991549948 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955942638701 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158507027483 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101526173724 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.