The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
The two pictures depict how the road accessing the city hospital transformed from 2007 to 2010.
As can be seen from the diagrams, there was a significant rearrangement in the Hospital road in three years. In addition, there were more streets leading to the amenities as well as the square of the hospital was shrunk .
It is clearly shown that the car park on the right of the Hospital Road, which is used for staff and public, was only used for workers in 2010, while the other was relocated on the right of the hospital. Moreover, the six bus stops alongside the Hospital Road were gathered into a major bus station on the left of the Hospital Road, accessing both the City Hospital and the City Road.
Regarding the Hospital Road, there were two roundabouts on the two points of the road, one connected the Ring Road, one connected the City Road.
- the diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish https www testbig com sites default files styles max 650x650 public preview png itok 1isRGv0K
- The pictures depict the alterations of Paradise island comparing the past with the present 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 61
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The two pictures compare transformations of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as the square of the hospital was shrunk . It is clearly shown that the car park ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42262464515 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519736842105 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6176167324 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419563555192 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220500160945 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150791819859 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286360777411 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131537106566 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.