The chart illustrates the number of people who has fruits and vegetables in their daily diet in the UK between 2001 and 2008.
Overall, the percentage of men, women and children had the same trend of peak the highest and slowly drop after the peak. The number of children and men both reached their highest in 2007 and decrease in 2008 while the women peak in 2006 and gradually drop after 2006. The number of children was the lowest from 2001 to 2008 while women was the highest during those periods.
In 2001, the number of children who had fruits and vegetables in their daily meals was around 13 percent with men and women had around 17 and 23 percent respectively. The figures of women had a gradual increase and peaked in 2006 with 35 percent while men and children stagnated from 2001 to 2003 but had experienced a sharp increase and both reached the highest in 2007 with men had around 27 percent and children had around 26 percent.
The number of women who had fruits and vegetables in their daily diet had gradually declined after 2006 with around 31 percent in 2007 and 30 percent in 2008 while the figures of men and children had a slight decrease in 2008 from about 27 percent to around 26 percent in men, and children dropped from approximately 26 percent to 24 percent in 2008.
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 67
- Many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialise with others What problems do children face when going online without parental supervision How can these problems be solved 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages toghther To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54700854701 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28564971262 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.346153846154 0.547539520022 63% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8590668373 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149271444212 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108336361268 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105859918905 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150980266358 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11825817023 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.82 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.4 10.3012195122 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.