A nation should requires all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Should the courses system for students in high school be the same or not? Recent debates about such question have attracted attentions of a number of people, some contend that it is beneficial to be unified in that it provides higher egalitarianism and efficiency; while others find study courses exploratory for students and students need to be allowed to select their own study plans. In my opinion, while I credit the same national curriculum with its equity, such advice is still met with problems contained in diferences in places.
Same national course system is wiping out factors not belonging to study itself, promising every child has the same target and touchstone. In China such mechanism ran very well in the past thirty years, especially as the biggest developing country and a country possessing rich history of reliance on interpersonal relationships. Furthermore, such mechanism helps reduce the family differences as well, not only those of education level of family menbers but also a more influencing element, financial situation. Therefore, prompting similar national course system perforemances well in promising egalitarianism in general.
However, benefits mentioned before, if we see them from another side, they will turn out to be downsides as well. Wiping family gaps in different dimensions was said to be beneficial, but the standard of the difficulty of the same national curriculum is not unmistakable. Take China as an example again, although generally speaking it is a developing country, some cities as Shanghai or Beijin have already been recognized as big modern cities in the world, thus it is not reasonable to set up a national curriculum based on the education level in those cities. Because students studying in poorer cities hardly possess the same ability to compete with those living in higher development cities. Facts in China have proved it.
Forcely requiring students to take national curriculum enervates their motivation on study. Students are specific individuals with disparate and wide-ranging dreams, if national curriculum is not what children want, it is not salubrious for them to love study. And education need to be lauched by guiding, how to intrigue students to explore the knowledge world and construct their own career road is the essence of education. While some children's dreaming study area is hard for parents to understand and is not tenacious when heard at the first time, such as game designs or sports managers, but parents should not hamper their imagination, they instead should help them choosing related foundational courses which are not contained within the traditional national course system.
To sum up, to prompt a national curriculum or not is based on a country's specific situation, and the both selection have good and bad sides. But for me, I believe it is beneficial to take various cures
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 16
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the general manager of KNOW radio station Several factors indicate that radio station KNOW should shit its programming from rock and roll music to a continuous news format Consider for example that the number of 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 83
- 12 Fifeen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall stude 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'courses'' or 'course's'?
Suggestion: courses'; course's
Should the courses system for students in high school be t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on the education level in those cities. Because students studying in poorer cities hard...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 674, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to choose' or 'choose'.
Suggestion: to choose; choose
...gination, they instead should help them choosing related foundational courses which are ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in general, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27826086957 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87293609653 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545652173913 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1659801055 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.888888889 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303581278074 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096558610757 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679739559998 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163136662166 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562450834428 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'courses'' or 'course's'?
Suggestion: courses'; course's
Should the courses system for students in high school be t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on the education level in those cities. Because students studying in poorer cities hard...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 674, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to choose' or 'choose'.
Suggestion: to choose; choose
...gination, they instead should help them choosing related foundational courses which are ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in general, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27826086957 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87293609653 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545652173913 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1659801055 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.888888889 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303581278074 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096558610757 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679739559998 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163136662166 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562450834428 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.