Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It’s hard to deny that many young people in China have the tradition to listen to their parents’ advices about their future, and such a custom may mislead impressionable people to generate the opinion that young people should rely on their parents to make decisions of their career. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as knowledge, horizon, and experience are concerned, I strongly hold that young generation in China are better to make the decisions about their future on their own.
First and foremost, the young men nowadays have further knowledge than their parent generation due to the great development of education in China. Take digitalization as an example, which the young generation is quite familiar with while their parents can hardly understand it, how could it be possible for people who don’t even have the adequate knowledge to make the right decision?
Furthermore, the fact that the young generation have more access to the world than the past indicates that young men have broader horizon than their parents. Take the case Chinese college students in the 1990s, who attend universities and have better accesses to abroad. Many of them choose to study further in famous foreign colleges and such precious experience broads their horizon. As a result, they can make more objective and rational decision on their career. Had it not been for the process of broadening their horizon, they would never examine their future from a higher perspective.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that parents have experience which has deposited for their whole life and the experience is always so right that the young generations should follow their advices as a tradition. Ironically, as David Hume suspects, how can experience be true for the things that don’t happen? Conservative Chinese emperors in Qing dynasty can never imagine the picture that he will be abolished during the revolution. Therefore, experience is limited to one’s status and knowledge which means it is always subjective. The young generation should make their own decisions.
In a nutshell, I maintain that young people are better able to make decisions about their own livings. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madision goes, ‘as long as the reason of man continues fallible, different opinions will be formed’, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 86 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70185383797 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518610421836 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3433060258 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37736373239 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131641717489 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128770440959 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229331150186 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762537544934 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.