Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children's behaviour.
Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children's behavior.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Show/hide explanation
Please note that while you CANNOT copy & paste the text of your essay from this window, you CAN highlight your essay text and drag & drop the text into another tab or text editor program if needed.
Increasing penetration of media have led to increased violence in the society. Its effects are highly visible in younger generation and is pervasive among children as well. There is sustained impact of media on human psychology and behaviour. Human behaviour gets influenced by the media, social media, news, entertainment and its influencers.
There is a perceived notion of influencers and media affinity in the society. People highly respect actors, influencers and follow what is being seen on the screen. Acrued followership of these influencers and media is the main reason behind this human psychology. Media micro and macro influencers have become epitome of the society cultures. Clothing they put on, food they eat, brands they use automatically becomes the notion with increased demand in the society.
Humans by nature look for communities they want to survive in. Human pyschology is derived from becoming more likable in the society. Due to this, even things stigmatised by influencers get marginalised by the society and vice versa. For example, a children seeing a travel influencer getting popularity in the society, will automatically be drawn towards becoming a travel agent. A child watching a singer on daily basis, will automatically be drawn towards becoming a singer.
The question arises of how the initial likability gets in shape. The initial impact begins at home. Parents and peer groups definitely works as role models. But, their culture and day to day actions plays more important role than their thinking. Child learn from visuals, and not what is being preached. Children have high observation powers to adapt to the environment and the culture.
With the pervasive media and internet connectivity, everyone is drawn towards media. Parents watch Television while eating, play games, check social media or news while waiting in the line. So, the similar behaviour is drawn in the kids. Kids get to watch the media and learn what is visible in the media. Media by its nature is biased to provide entertainment more than teachings. for examplee, the movies on love stories impacts child psychology to have a pratner in young age, the movie on violence impacts the child to act like a villian or a hero. Even the movies on great characters also has a villian that automaticaly creates the biased stories. There is increased hatred, animosity and less of empathy in the behaviour.
There are definitely exceptions to these cases. But those are very rare. Only when the parents are highly stoic in their characters can teach their kids to be disciplined. There are many examples of parents and peers being great role models in the society, but that needs powerful habits in day to day life. Powerful character building requires great determination and conducive environment. For example, Swami Vivekananda, a great Indian legend has been learning from great mentor and parents with honest attitudes. There are many such examples.
Therefore, Children becomes what they see. Parents have to become real role models. If they are drawn towards media, children automatically will be inclined towards media. Media by its own nature involves a lot of violence, hatred and competitiveness. There is automatic inclination to be like that.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-19 | Emg_107 | 50 | view |
2023-07-12 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
2023-05-02 | Payal_2610 | 50 | view |
2023-04-22 | keisham | 83 | view |
2023-03-29 | aiswaryae | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Child) must be used with a third-person verb: 'learns'.
Suggestion: learns
...portant role than their thinking. Child learn from visuals, and not what is being pre...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...vide entertainment more than teachings. for examplee, the movies on love stories im...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3373.0 2235.4752809 151% => OK
No of words: 642.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.253894081 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03365860172 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72510307678 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481308411215 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1053.9 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 45.0 20.2370786517 222% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.093776427 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9555555556 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2666666667 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.97078651685 221% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 21.0 4.83258426966 435% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347239023884 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728888718421 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12549812282 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15779909674 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.244323294994 0.0667264976115 366% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.