The sale and use of hard drugs are prohibited in many countries, but tobacco and alcohol are sold and consumed. Governments should apply laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs to all drugs, including tobacco and alcohol.
What is your opinion?
Looking from a socioeconomic perspective, while people in many countries have applauded governmental policies on banning the use of hard drugs, some still think that tobacco and alcohol should not be left out since they share comparable detrimental impacts. Personally, I firmly agree that there should be detailed legislative documents on the prohibition of tobacco and alcoholic products to gauge public well-being.
Despite limited scientific reports on direct associations between tobacco and tragic deaths, long-term use of this addictive product might result in unimaginable consequences. Heavy smokers are susceptible to a variety of health risks, including lung cancer and other cardiovascular problems, and illustrations in an effort of propagating these deadly threats can be easily found in every corner of the world. However, the number of smokers has shown no sign of decline and if there are no actions taken, humankind can expect to have a future generation of descendants covered in smog. This is not to mention the profound impacts that tobacco can exert on the social economy. In many countries, tobacco and other smoking-related products are heavily taxed by the government in an attempt to reduce smoking behaviours. Unexpectedly, such a heavy taxation seems to do more harm than good as it makes the price of tobacco escalate and smokers are still willing to pay a fortune to ease their addiction. This has accidentally resulted in more financial burdens for families as there will be additional costs in their monthly budget.
Comparatively, alcoholic products have been listed in the prohibition list proposed to many governments around the world but this international effort still remains in vain. It is universally reported that a vast number of traffic accidents were caused by drunken drivers. Unlike in the past when people simply consumed alcohol in celebration of special occasions, stressful ways of living teeming with countless workloads and technological advancements in the twenty-first century have propelled people to seek alcoholic products as an escape. The biochemical influences of alcohol will make people lose their consciousness and control of their body, leading to tragic road accidents. In addition, just like tobacco, alcohol is heavily taxed and eventually becomes an unaffordable product for low-income families. Consequently, a high market demand followed by gigantic profits will encourage unethical acts interfering with this highly profitable market, leading to the emergence of black markets where beers and wines are smuggled and sold at a much more affordable price.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that governmental actions in preventing and eliminating the dissemination of tobacco and alcohol are essential. Without these, the society very soon will be flooded with abusive smoking and drinking behaviours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-01 | trikhung777 | 89 | view |
- Schools should focus more on teaching students how to be successful in the workforce and less on helping them to achieve academic success To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 80
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the informat 79
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, still, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62954545455 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09977921768 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611363636364 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5385710293 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.705882353 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190694894093 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566032323576 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515342726914 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120125424982 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647530923885 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, still, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62954545455 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09977921768 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611363636364 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5385710293 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.705882353 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190694894093 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566032323576 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515342726914 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120125424982 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647530923885 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.