The charts below show the changes in the ownership of households electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The given line charts illustrate the changes in households purchasing the electrical appliances, also, the amount of time was spent doing housechores in one nation between 1920 and 2019. Overall, it can be seen from the first graph that the highest percentage of households owning house electrical devices was in 2019. Regarding the second chart, the weekly amount of time, that was spent on housework, decreased over the time.
To begin with, people have shown a high tendency to own household appliances during the time. In 1920, only %40 of houses bought the washing machine, and it has increased to %70 in 1960. After that, it experienced a decrease in 1980 to %65 before it raised again to reach %85 in 2019. In contrast, no house had the refrigerator in 1920, but after that it had dramatically increased to reach %100 in 2019. Compared to the vacuum cleaner, %30 of people had purchased it in 1920, and this percentage had a steady rise over the years until it became %100 in 2019.
Moreover, the weekly time spent on housechores per house was falling over the years. In 1920, 50 hours per week was allocated for housework, then, it started to gradually decrease to 20 hours in 1960 until only 10 hours per week in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Dida18 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the macronutrient intake of Australians in term of kilocalories per day per person from 1909 to 2006 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information show 78
- some people say that advetising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things others people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it discuss both the views and give your opinion 73
- The diagram below shows the process of how for recycling plastic bottles 61
- Some people fail in school but ending up being successful in life why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing ro succeed in life 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73953488372 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55629531832 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544186046512 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8031444986 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31728017382 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124617296069 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122482460793 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212125356944 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151861221015 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.