The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph compares the amounts of fish and other three different meat consumed in a European country in the years 1979 and 2004.
It is clear that chicken was by far the most popular meat over the period shown. Fish was the least consumed meat in each year.
In 1979, beef was consumed most with around 220 grams per person per week. Lamb and chicken were eaten weekly at a rate of just under 150 grams per person, and fish was the least favorite meat with weekly consumption of only 60 grams per person. However, after 10 years, specifically in 1989, chicken overtook beef as the most liked meat.
In 2004, the consumption of chicken rose dramatically to a high of 250 grams per person per week. By contrast, the amount of beef and lamb eaten weekly by an average person fell substantially to nearly 120 grams and 70 grams, respectively. However, the figure for fish remained relatively stable at between 45 and 55 grams for the whole 25-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The three diagrams below show the development of and plans for the coastal zone of Brightsea Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 84
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970 1990 and 2000 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66081871345 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36406356784 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9845645922 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192784437321 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932724028383 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10726418877 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158979038193 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130377634005 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.