Many people argue that richness and physical belongings are key criteria of measuring success. In my opinion, being affluent is not the best indicator of success, however, contributing to a better society leads an individual to become truly successful.
To commence with, being wealthy is considered as an essential trait of success’s definition in this modern-day world. This could be due to the fact that owing a financial advancement and having capacity to afford luxury items and fabulous lifestyle are vitally important to many people in society as a way to demonstrate their successes. Moreover physical assets offer people autonomy to make choices about living the lives they desire, therefore, many individuals regard affluence as a golden key to open the door of success in their lifetime.
Nevertheless, the definition of success does not just limit to the materialistic things, making significant contributions to the development of society is also an integral feature to illustrate success.For instance, during the covid 19 pandemic, doctors, nurses and scientists play an indispensable role to alleviate the spread of this deadly virus as well as come up with the vaccine to prevent the rate of exposure of this infectious disease worldwide. This is an astronomical success of all people working in the medical field and they deserve praise for their successful achievements.
In conclusion, being wealth-off and possessing luxurious properties can not comprehensively define a person’s success, contribution to society is also an essential element that contributes to a successful life. In my view, both wealth and social contribution are equally of paramount importance to define success.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows show the number of cars made in Argentina Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...s a way to demonstrate their successes. Moreover physical assets offer people autonomy t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... integral feature to illustrate success.For instance, during the covid 19 pandemic,...
^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to praise'
Suggestion: to praise
...g in the medical field and they deserve praise for their successful achievements. ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ise for their successful achievements. In conclusion, being wealth-off and poss...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54372623574 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17408290626 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.13357993 49.4020404114 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.0 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279705499444 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129801571712 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690813969591 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178634530406 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629055864649 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.