In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
From times unknown, irrespective of the field, there was always a struggle for power. This power is given to a governing body to take decisions for the collective good. The governing body should not just have the power to take decisions, but should also be transparent and accountable for its actions. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the prompt and I think that the ones in power should step down after five years for two reasons.
First, we have to make sure that there is no curroption or other forms of wrongdoings committed by the ones incharge, making the ones in power more cautious of their actions. For example, the many atrosities committed by the Nazis have come to light only after their defeat in the World War 2. The people in Germany itself might not have known of these cruel acts that took place in their country since most of them were being closely monitored by the ruling party themselves. Though there was a electorial system in place, the Nazi propaganda was so powerful to manipulate and annihialate any form of revolt or rebellion in the state. If there was a system in place that forced the Nazis give power to another party after five years, many of these crimes could have been pointed out in the initial stages and created a possibility to solve these issues.
Secondly, it is important to bring more views into consideration and practice different approaches to welfare. As humans, especially the ones in power, tend to have more bias to their own methods and be skeptical about the ones proposed by others. For example, if a certain action plan with great potential was proposed by someone that is not in power, it is possible that merits might not be considered accuratelty by the ones in power, thereby causing it to never being implemented. If there is roatation in power, it gives an opportunity to try out the different approach and hence creating more paths in the journey to success. A five year tenure would be enough time to not only implement, but also observe the short term and long term benefits of a course of action.
One could say that the constant change in power could cause disruption in the current ways of operation, the new ones in power could discontinue the progress acheived by the previous ones in charge thereby wasting resources and time spent. But, shouldn't a great plan in motion have enough public and political support to avoid shutting down if there is a proper system put in place? Wouldn't it prove to be constructive if bad ideas were shut down with sound reasoning? I would say that if there is no rotation of power after five years, it would only cause more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | jenas | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | Mirza Raquib | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | yfli | 70 | view |
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years 62
- Because people increasingly feel compelled to share their personal details online the right to privacy is eroding 83
- The following appeared in an e mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville Over the past ten years there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre productio 78
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts belie 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...down after five years for two reasons. First, we have to make sure that the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ling party themselves. Though there was a electorial system in place, the Nazi pr...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... possibility to solve these issues. Secondly, it is important to bring more ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...term benefits of a course of action. One could say that the constant change i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... wasting resources and time spent. But, shouldnt a great plan in motion have enough publ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Wouldn't
... there is a proper system put in place? Wouldnt it prove to be constructive if bad idea...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'proves'?
Suggestion: proves
... proper system put in place? Wouldnt it prove to be constructive if bad ideas were sh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68308351178 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48213402557 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507494646681 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9841055341 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9444444444 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249855936473 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787423095972 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590405958666 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158155578753 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760973941718 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.