Is it better to spend money on traveling and vacations or to save money for the future?
Wealth has an abundance of functions, and we can utilize our money to achieve lots of specific goals. This will raise the question of whether people should spend their income on traveling and vacations or save money for the future. In my opinion, I will be willing to spend money on traveling and vacations.
To begin with, spending money on traveling and vacations enables me to broaden my horizon. I will obtain a great opportunity to get acquainted with other people during the trip and extend my social network. For example, I would like to travel to other countries and have an in-depth interaction with local people, such as discussing the problem of inflation in the US or the rise and fall of the British Empire. I could use this kind of precious chance to understand how local people think about their government and policy. In addition, I will also spend my budget to explore a few historical attractions, like the ancient Roman arena or Greek remains. I could profoundly realize how a great civilization developed and declined by visiting those ancient cultures. By contrast, if I just choose to save income rather than use the money to travel, I would not be capable of broadening my international vision.
Second, allocating my capital for traveling and vacations to relax from my extremely fatigued life. As a software engineer with a heavy burden in studying, it’s genuinely an opportunity for me to get rid of the pressure at work. For instance, when I plan to arrange my vacation days, I tend to visit several alluring natural scenes, like Sun Moon lake or Green island. On one hand, I could totally immerse myself in appealing nature by seeing charming landscapes or listening to animals singing. On the other hand, I could utilize my leisure time to make plentiful treasurable memories with family and share our daily life. In contrast, if I choose to save money instead of investing my capital to travel, I may not be able to release those annoying working stress and enhance family bonding.
To sum up, these are the two reasons why I choose to spend money on traveling and vacations. For one thing, assigning our funds to travel and vacations could benefit us to step out of our comfort zone and broaden our horizons. For another, distributing our money on traveling and vacations could eliminate our working pressure.
- The government should focus more on improving the Internet or public transportation system 66
- In times of economic crisis governments often reduce the money they spend in some areas Of the three choices listed below if a government is facing economic problems which one should the government spend less money on Arts Scientific research or Parks and 85
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessels were about 2 200 years old Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod The a 65
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 58
- The government should focus more on improving the Internet or public transportation system 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...lots of specific goals. This will raise the question of whether people should spend their income on tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, kind of, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87032418953 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68696732567 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533665835411 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8010656928 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.789473684 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353434418266 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121986570983 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114025110042 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256634210049 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873115764093 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.