The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line graph illustrates how many people used motor cars in the UK between 1975 to 2005.
Looking at the chart, it is immediately obvious that the proportion of the population who owned two or three cars rose while the opposite was true for those who had no car. Additionally, having one car was unchanged during the period shown.
In 1975, the percentage of people having one automobile in their house was 45% whilst people with no car was slightly lower, at roughly 43%. These figures both declined over the following decade, to around 37% for people owning one car and 25% for those with no car. In the last year of the survey (2005), the number of citizens who owned a car recovered back compared with the original year whereas the percentage of dwellers with no car continued to decrease to about 23% at the same time.
The number of England owned 2-3 cars occupied just about 7% and 4% of the total population of England, respectively. These figures continually increased over the period shown, reaching approximately 19% for inhabitants with 2 cars and nearly 10% for residents with 3 cars in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 72
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 89
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 82
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74742268041 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55841001247 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8651215522 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20057879316 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990448203373 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439861168446 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141738205798 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367862497439 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.