AD: face-to-face communication better?
It's believed that everyone will need to communicate or interact with other people during their studies or work to discuss some projects and there are plentiful manners to do such things. Some prefer to talk in person, while others think that using e-mail can be more efficient. My personal experience has led me to conclude that the former is better.
To begin with, face-to-face communication can let people know each other’s opinions immediately and thus probably speed up the process of discussion. In contrast, people might not always be free to read emails and make response instantly. Thereby, writing e-mails will be a waste of time. For example, if your work program runs into an emergency, I believe that instead of spending time writing e-mails to inform your colleagues and waiting for their response, you might decide to find them in person and discuss it with them urgently. Therefore, I believe that communicating in person can be immediate, save time, and prevent waiting.
Second, sometimes, people might have difficulty expressing their ideas through e-mails. There might be some details that people can’t precisely describe in the form of words. Conversely, in my opinion, it will be easier to do such things when I communicate with others in person. I can elaborate my thoughts, thoroughly as well as acutely. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in college, I always asks my teammates to discuss team projects together. By doing so, we can completely make our points clear and let each other understand different ideas without mistakes. Accordingly, not only do we usually finish our work efficiently but also produce better performance.
Last but not least, I really enjoy the feeling of interacting with my work partners in person. It makes me feel that I’m in a team and encourages me to leave no stone unturned to make contributions. For example, when I was in college, I participated in several academic contests with a team. Seeing my teammates enthusiastically discuss with each other, I knew that I needed to study more and dedicated myself to the team. It motivated me to do my best. As a result, the outcomes of the competitions undoubtedly always went well.
To summarize, it’s undeniable that there are several ways to communicate with others. Nevertheless, from what I’ve mentioned above, I strongly agree that face-to-face communication can benefit your studies or work and produce better performance.
- TPO 48 Integrated Writing Task In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 80
- pterosaurs flying ability 86
- frogs and fungus 76
- Eco certification in the US 3
- Live in one place 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'ask'
Suggestion: ask
...f this. When I was in college, I always asks my teammates to discuss team projects t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12839506173 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93453024589 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5677151794 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5416666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150595563323 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415236192021 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876924873687 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11565677068 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12453022479 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.