The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The given table illustrates the entire value while the pie charts describe the percentage of fish that the United States bought from three different areas in 1988, 1992 and 2000.
Overall, it can easily be seen that the US spent more and more money buying fish from 1988 to 2000. It is also clear that the amount of fish imported from Canada was the highest in the first year but then decreased while China and other countries became the main sources over the whole period.
Looking more at the table for more data, over the 12-year period, the value of imported fish increased dramatically in the US. This figure increased significantly from 6.57 billion dollars to 8.52 billion and 10.72 billion in 1992 and 2000 respectively.\
In terms òf the three pie charts, In 1988, 60 percent of the fish supplied in the US came from Canada, by 2000, that percentage had dramatically dropped to only 28 percent. The figure for China, on the other hand, increased more two times from 13% to 30%. Fish imports by Americans from other countries increased from 46% in 1992 to 42% in 2000. Other nations grew to be the major souces with 46% in 1992 and finally reached 42% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-21 | minh2012 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | nurullaili69 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | nurullaili69 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | dddd | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | dddd | view |
- The first chart shows the population of England and wales between 1700 and 2000 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rate in the same countries in the same period 74
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 78
- Many people today are worried about young children using video games What problems might these games cause for children and society as a whole How could these problems be reduced 78
- The pictures below show how tea is produced They also illustrate the process of making a cup of tea 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely.\ In terms òf the three pie charts, In 1988, 60 percent of the fish supplied...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66826923077 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30327602262 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4622933791 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255466079456 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117605636245 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729340430855 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172926495727 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448766937507 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.