Should governments or states use their tax revenue to provide free school places?
These days, education resources have become unequal between the wealthy and the poor. One way to build the gap is for the authorities to use their tax revenue to provide free school places. I agree with this statement for the two following reasons.
First off, tax revenue mostly comes from citizens, so the authority needs to do something to pay it back. Providing free school places is the most necessary among citizens. Take citizens in Taiwan as an example; as long as they have work, they are obliged to pay the tax to the government. People who earn more money need to pay more taxes. Since the majority of profit comes from citizens, the government should use part of that money on citizens. Education is necessary among all households as long as there are children in the family, so providing free school places is the easiest and most effective way to make citizens notice what they have paid has been applied to themselves instead of being wasted. However, if the government thanks citizens by giving out many foods, people may not feel grateful since they hate the smell and flavor of the food given out freely by the government. Therefore, using the tax revenue to provide free school places is more effective.
Secondly, education decides whether a person has the ability to contribute to society. If they are well-educated, they have more chances to burden the loads and hand in more money to the government. For instance, in east Africa, people seldom got educated, so they could not engage in high-level work. In this way, the money they could earn becomes less than that of people who did high-level work. Therefore, they could not get money to pay for the government. The government thus did not have enough money to improve its education system. However, people in the United States have a lot of educational institutes and laboratories that make people gain more hands-on experience and knowledge. These can make them more competent in doing their jobs and eventually get paid higher. As a result, they can make more money and pay more taxes.
In conclusion, I believe that governments or states should use their tax revenue to provide free school places. This is because providing free school places is a beneficial way to reward people and offer educational opportunities to the next generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-24 | jjj33333 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | jjj33333 | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-11 | heman@saini | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-16 | sona1988 | 80 | view |
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why 70
- Which of the following ways can help children behave better limiting types of television programs and movies spend more time talking with children supervising and monitoring 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 52
- Which of the following ways can help children behave better limiting types of television programs and movies spend more time talking with children supervising and monitoring 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90609137056 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57915604747 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47461928934 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9524772487 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8636363636 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343916342048 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120144119517 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188382953326 0.0737576698707 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29575052972 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208256908843 0.0645574589148 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90609137056 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57915604747 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47461928934 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9524772487 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8636363636 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343916342048 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120144119517 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188382953326 0.0737576698707 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29575052972 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208256908843 0.0645574589148 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.