Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is becoming significantly common these days that economic organizations make use of sporting occasions to advertise their offerings. Some individuals object to the movement as it brings more harm than good to the development of sports. I somewhat disagree with this view as sports can be enormously beneficial from the firm sponsorship.
The first reason why I oppose the view is that given the financial resources from companies, organizers of the event would be able to invest in holding captivating sporting events. The investment attracts more audience and generating more profit for the relevant individuals and companies. This means that there will be more tax contribute to local funds, thereby stimulating the growth of the local economy.
Another explanation for my support of sport advertisements is that it could merits athletes. If professional attendants of sporting events accept to endorse or advertise the products of particular brands, they can receive a decent income and being provided with adequate nutrition. This enables the professionals to focus on their sport career and enhance performance.
Admittedly, there are still occasions when firms may over-abuse advertising in sporting events. This especially the true of companies, which attempt to present their low-quality and harzadous products to customers. In this case, utilization of sporting championships would be a negative development.
In sum, I somewhat object to the idea since the phenomenon brings more merits to people. Even though some firms may overuse events of sporting activities and neglect customers' rights, the events generally opens up many opportunities for people making money and professionals improving their achievement.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Some believe that younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting older family members when they become physically mentally and financially unable to look after themselves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 84
- Intelligence is the most important quality of leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on environmental pollution and housing problems To some extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'merit'
Suggestion: merit
...f sport advertisements is that it could merits athletes. If professional attendants of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67432950192 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10897762001 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616858237548 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5233618687 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.785714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22972174597 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765722668152 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540295163746 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131257050842 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443487488023 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.