Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is becoming significantly common these days that economic organizations make use of sporting occasions to advertise their offerings. Some individuals object to the movement as it brings more harm than good to the development of sports. I somewhat disagree with this view as sports can be enormously beneficial from the firm sponsorship.
The first reason why I oppose the view is that given the financial resources from companies, organizers of the event would be able to invest in holding captivating sporting events. The investment attracts more audience and generating more profit for the relevant individuals and companies. This means that there will be more tax contribute to local funds, thereby stimulating the growth of the local economy.
Another explanation for my support of sport advertisements is that it could merits athletes. If professional attendants of sporting events accept to endorse or advertise the products of particular brands, they can receive a decent income and have provision of adequate nutritions. This allows the professionals to raise their living standard, improve their physicque, and focus on their sport career, which in turn enhances performance.
Admittedly, there are still occasions when firms may over-abuse advertising in sporting events. This especially the true of companies, which attempt to depict their low-quality products, which may contain hazardous subtances, to customers. In this case, utilization of sporting championships would be a negative development.
In sum, I somewhat object to the idea since the phenomenon brings more merits to people. Even though some firms may overuse events of sporting activities and neglect customers' rights, the events generally opens up many opportunities for people making money and professionals improving their achievement
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- In recent years tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit However some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'merit'
Suggestion: merit
...f sport advertisements is that it could merits athletes. If professional attendants of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69343065693 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09138522056 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620437956204 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.901153377 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229476682572 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747892252611 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562938188986 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127665985937 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479361690072 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.