The use of social media may replace face-to-face contact. Do advantages of the development outweigh its disadvantages.
The replacement of social media with in-person communication has become significant in recent years. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this movement would overshadow its benefits.
On the one hand, communicating on social media appears as problematic. Body languagues, appearances, are important factors, based on which people can assess the reliability of strangers. Given the restrictions of these elements while interacting via the platforms, people may find it difficult to evaluate others' reliability, which is essential to maintain healthy relationships. Another downside of socializing on the social media is that the users may fall victims to cybercrimes. It is becomming increasingly common that people harnessing the online applications for establishing new intimate connection. Due to this, some law-offenders take advantages of the online instruments to steal people's money or personal information. In this case, the tech-savvy try to develope close bond with their targets, especially women, then start to inquire either financial support, or private data from them. This not only places the unfortunate victims at risk of economic loss, but personal reputation damage.
On the other hand, there are merits associated with the linkage of people through social media in lieu of direct interactions. The first upside is that social media remove physical barriers between people. Historically, people have to visit their accquaintances in order to exchange information with them. Given tehcnological advances equipped with social media, individuals can share their feelings, upload images and videos about their life with their friends and loved ones without traveling long distance. Likewise, humans can make their contact at anytime as it does not need accomodations for people's communication to take place. Unlike before, when persons gather at public space, coffee shops, restaurants, and cinemas to talk. With social media chat function, people can have talks whenever they have adequate equiment and internet connection.
In sum, even though social media channels relieve people of the distance, and time limitation, they may loss their money or private information. However, in general, I believe that the development do more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-17 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-11 | lakha singh | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-29 | Thao Anh194 | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | Thao Anh194 | 49 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- These days the fashions in clothing are constantly changing Is this affecting individuals and the environment in positive or a negative way Give reasons for your answer and support by giving examples 89
- Some people think that the best way to become successful in life is to get a university education whereas others say this is no longer true Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Companies use major sporting events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...friends and loved ones without traveling long distance. Likewise, humans can make...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, then, while, as to, in general, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71597633136 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01519209254 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644970414201 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4851125105 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.684210526 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168931024387 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554782749438 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497154185107 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116224645094 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199017941185 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.