If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working, people would choose a life without work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether people choose not working lives or lives, which take individuals a great deal of time for work is a controversial issue. In my opinion, working is an intergral part of human's life, therefore, it is mandatory for people to work even jobs may constitute majority of their schedule.
There are several reasons behind the phenomenon that wokers investing a large amount of time and energy in working including working benefits, passion and personal background. The first point in support of this view is that people can receive additional income from extra hours. With more money received, working people are able to improve their living standard and live better off themselves. Likewise, by working longer time, workers can gain more experience from tasks, which allows them to achieve professional progression and climb high on the career ladder. Besides, some people are passionate about their work and have a tendency to commit resources for contributing more to organisations. If these individuals do not support their company enough, they may feel not deserving salary, perks and allowences that are given to them. Finally, some disadvantaged persons are unable to land a job that require standard working time, thereby accepting working additional time in exchange for the work. This is especially the case for impoverished people or individuals, who are not equipped with adequate qualifications. Thus, working or not is not optional for most persons, there are motivations for people working extended time.
Admittedly, there are still occasions when overwork can cause detrimental impacts on wage-earners' mental and physical health. It is common that job holders regularly experience stress and anxiety. This stems from the fact that fierce competition in labor market and heavy workload in modern workplaces constantly require woker's to learn and improve productivity. Likewise, people spending long hours working physically demanding jobs may encounter injuries. This is because people have their physical limit, thereby, long-time exposure to work places workers at greater risk of having accidents. Thus, people, who are busy with work are prone to different types of risk. However, given the enhancement in working environment and safety procedures, impacts from the development are alliviated. That is why busy working may not seem negative to employees for the time being.
In sum, working long hours is a popular movement in modern world. Therefore, I disagree with the idea that people opt for being unemployeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-16 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | rika205 | 61 | view |
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crimes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people What do you think about this viewpoint 89
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[2]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to work'.
Suggestion: to work
Whether people choose not working lives or lives, which take individuals ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, still, therefore, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42784810127 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80854785166 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572151898734 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9838563782 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.095238095 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328381694971 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101629864672 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722928481239 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214154524108 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07477671017 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.