The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart gives information about families who owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2010.
Overall, during the first half of the period, more rented houses than owned houses were chosen while an opposite trend was observed over the final 30 years.
In 1918, nearly four times the proportion of people lived in rented houses as much as in their owned houses. The figure for hired accommodation slightly decreased and stayed unchanged at nearly 70% while possessing accommodation had a gradual increase before being stable in 1930 and 1953. Households who accommodated in owned houses accounted for 20% less than in rented houses before both figures recorded 50%.
During the next ten years, the number of possessed homes had a dramatic increase and outlooked renting houses. It continued rising and reaching a peak of nearly 70% before dropping by 6% in 2011. The percentage of households renting homes had a gradual decline from 30% but a small rise of 5% in the last period.
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown bel 70
- Childhood obesity has become a serious problem in recent years What are the primary cause of this What measures should be taken to reduce childhood obesity 56
- The picture below shows the differences in the layout of conference center in 2010 and 2025 61
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufacturedThe diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 74
- To succeed in business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...ed houses than owned houses were chosen while an opposite trend was observed over the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98224852071 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56803370323 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0309538725 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279659392926 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119912923551 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914407738918 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172619028963 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103242786577 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.