The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The given bar chart compares five distinct cities in Australia in terms of their inhabitants’ coffee and tea drinking and buying habits in the last 4 weeks.
As can be seen from the graph, drinking coffee or tea at a cafe was the most popular habit among most of these cities, whereas the opposite was true for buying fresh coffee. It is also noticeable that the biggest difference can be seen in the proportion of buying fresh coffee and going to a cafe in Hobart city.
It is clear that the majority of city dwellers in five cities went to coffee shops to drink coffee or tea. More than 60% people in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart drank coffee or tea at a cafe, while the figures for Brisbane and Adelaide were slightly lower, standing at about 55% and below 50% respectively.
Looking at other drinking and buying habits, we can see that purchasing instant coffee made up the second largest percentage among mentioned cities during the last 4 weeks. More than a half of people living in Brisbane and Hobart have the habit of purchasing instant coffee. At the same time, the figure for other cities were under 50%. The least common purchasing and drinking habit was buying fresh coffee. Brisbane and Adelaide had equal figures, at 34%, while approximately 37% Hobart’s citizens had this habit. The habit of purchasing fresh coffee was more prevalent in Sydney and Melbourne. The proportion of Sydney’s people had this habit was 43%, and that of Merbourne was lower, standing at 42%.
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 75
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 73
- The natural resources such as oil forest and fresh water are being consumed at an ever increasing rate What problems does it couse How can we solve these preblems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79457364341 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44519582718 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496124031008 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3939035187 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.083333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194197188245 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837474474753 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520227813713 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144821456518 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409964550635 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.