A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about animal rights. While some argue that it is accepted to employ animals for a range of purposes like food or studies, I still believe that animals should not be treated the same as humans.
For a variety of reasons, people believe that animals should be uses to satisfy humans’ demands. It is true that animals is an indispensable part of daily meal of a host of people. They are nutritious food which provides people with a tremendous amount of protein and other necessary nutrition. For instance, a great number of athletes eat meat on a daily basis with the aim of having strong and muscular body to compete with the other ones. Besides, meat and fish are frequently added to the meal of children to ensure their comprehensive development. Some people also believe that it is ordinary for people to decimate animals and eat them because they are below humans in the food chain. Furthermore, animals are of paramount importance in scientific researches, and experiments on animals greatly contribute to advancing our comprehension of pharmaceutical and diseases so people can deal with these problems better. This is due to the fact that many medical testings cannot be done on humans and carrying out researches using small animals like mouses or birds is faster because their large population. One obvious example is that the emergence of drugs using for the patients of covid-19 pandemic, which led to a breakthrough in our fight against this infectious illness, was involved testings on white mouses.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that it is unethical to decimate animals for humans’ needs and animals should be treated fairly. On the one hand, it is argued that the benefits of researches involving animals do not justify for the suffering caused and people have no moral rights to use them in our scientific experiments. The detrimental impacts on their bodies begotten by these studies may create permanent damages for animals. Moreover, people still have other methods to research. The advance of technonology has enabled scientists to do these experiments in virtual labs, which can simulate the identical one in real life and give us the same results as real tests. On the second hand, a diet without meat can bring a healthy life for us. It is obvious that a host of vegetarians have healthy lives although they do not eat any red meat in their lives. It is also reported that the elimination of red meat in daily diet also leads to the drop in the risk of stroke and other cardiovascular diseases owing to the decrease of cholesterol in our bodies.
In conclusion, it seems to me that human rights should be respected and we should treat them as fairly as an ordinary person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- The natural resources such as oil forest and fresh water are being consumed at an ever increasing rate What problems does it couse How can we solve these preblems 73
- People are surrounded by advertising which has an increasing effect on our lives Do you think the positive effects of this outweigh the negative effects 70
- Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89316239316 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71423374022 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4063225683 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452510297061 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134890237954 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10430931741 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281235778342 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672398349182 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.