A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Some people believe that animal exploitation should be prohibited as animals also have similar feelings as humans, whereas the opponents of this perspective want to utilize animals to meet a variety of their requirements such as food and study. In my view, both approaches offer numerous merits and are worthy of full attention but it would be better to employ animals appropriately and effectively to improve our quality of life.
On the one hand, some people argued that laws should protect animals since they share the same rights as people and must coexist with them on the planet. First and foremost, we should respect them and refrain from acting in a way that would endanger their survival if they don't do anything detrimental or destructive to human life. Animals undoubtedly contribute to the diversity of our environment and the ecological balance of our ecosystem. Secondly, some animals are our good friends from a long time ago. For example, dogs and cats can live with people as their friends and make us happy and safe. Eventually, dogs can help people hunt and play as guards to protect poultry on farms. Besides pets, dolphins are often believed to be friendly because they save people who have accidents in the sea.
On the other hand, it would be more beneficial if we could responsibly use animals for particular reasons such as food sources and study. Firstly, animals should be used wisely to supply enough nutrition for our daily diet. Without consuming fish and meat, we cannot maintain our muscles and our energy levels. Second, some investigations that couldn't be done on humans should be successfully conducted on animals. For instance, rats and rabbits are frequently employed in vaccine research to assist humans in determining the best vaccine against major diseases including malaria, HIV, flu, and especially Covid-19.
In conclusion, although animals should have the same rights as humans have, in my opinion, human life is far more important. If animals are not used for research and food, humans will fail in developing various life-saving drugs in the future and many people will not get food in climatically hostile areas of the earth. Finally, humans should protect them from illegal hunting and we exploit them in a proportionate way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid 56
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 56
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 56
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard on their studies What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some people believe that animal exploita...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tively to improve our quality of life. On the one hand, some people argued t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t would endanger their survival if they dont do anything detrimental or destructive ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people who have accidents in the sea. On the other hand, it would be more ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...evels. Second, some investigations that couldnt be done on humans should be successfull...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a, HIV, flu, and especially Covid-19. In conclusion, although animals shou...
^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proportionate way" with adverb for "proportionate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rom illegal hunting and we exploit them in a proportionate way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09866666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64314156513 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6008287686 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.470588235 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49380705402 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140771958982 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881262052013 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295052349526 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462098477523 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.