The table compares the proportion of primary school students in different educational issues between 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the most problem in school A student is following instructions and in school B is concentration in lessons. However, from 2005 to 2015, the percentage of children who have problems with following instructions decreased significantly while that in school remained unchanged.
In 2015, the percentage of problems regarding following instruction faced by children in school A is the highest, making up 42% of the total, followed closely by the rates of concentration problems (40%). While in school B, concentration in lessons is the most problematic for students with 15% of the total and only ̉̀6% of students have difficulty in following instructions which is 7 times lower than that of school A.
In 2015, the rates of school A's students having problems with following instructions decreased significantly from 42% to only 18%, becoming the least problem for students whereas the proportion of handwriting problems remains unchanged and is the prevalent problem. In school B, concentration in lessons is still the most problematic for students with 15% similar to the verbal expression of ideas. Only 7% of school B's students faced handwriting problems compared to 28% of that in school A.
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives the information about the common activities children of different ages do as part of their bedtime routine Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30046948357 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12289515616 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446009389671 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.529235278 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.125 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267106153309 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154343489757 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706701962522 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203565542699 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323790568774 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30046948357 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12289515616 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446009389671 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.529235278 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.125 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267106153309 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154343489757 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706701962522 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203565542699 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323790568774 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.