Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I prefer to support the idea of the government allocating extra funds to accelerate programs that improve our environment. I think that this option is comparatively better than the other, simply because the environment has much more impact on society and it has much more importance. Let us discuss the same in the following paragraphs.
First, Compared to artistic programs, Environment is an important factor in the living standards of the public and plays a major role in the quality of an individual’s life. For instance, a clean neighbourhood with proper sanitation and health standards tends to improve the Human Development Index of that location. Thus, there is a dire need to improve the environment to improve the standard of living.
Second, There are rapid advancements in Industrialisation and Urbanisation in developing countries like India. Along with such activities, Global Warming also tends to increase as a result. For instance, temperature levels in Chennai have increased in the last ten years due to pollution and global warming. Hence, It is important to reduce such harmful effects of industrialisation.
Furthermore, Creating media campaigns to promote sustainable means of living and actively taking efforts to improve sustainability can be essential. Since sustainability is an important point of discussion among current generations. For example, My peers opt to buy paper straws instead of plastic straws, to reduce waste. Therefore, they make an effort to be more environmentally friendly.
As my concluding statement, I would like to state that I prefer the notion that the government should spend additional funds to accelerate programs to improve the environment since it plays a major part in our lives and it is essential to reduce the effect of climate change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 76 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | ChiuYuan | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | ursula | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | punam | 83 | view |
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 85
- Some people say that a child can develop on its own others say that teachers and parents have crucial role Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people say that a child can develop on its own others say that teachers and parents have crucial role Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- some university students want to learnabout other subject in addition to their main subjects others believe it is more important to give their time and attention to studying for a qualification discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- the use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in socity do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mprove sustainability can be essential. Since sustainability is an important point of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 283.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40282685512 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25916137636 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5178462116 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192863238714 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525269820779 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756046179197 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105747974378 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886954898729 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.