In many countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country. Others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
A commonly seen phenomenon in nations is that the minority of the population receive appreciable incomes. In practical senses, this is deemed a huge advantage to their countries whereas some believe that there should be an authoritative limit set in this. While both views voice their own rights, I opine that a moderate balance should be established for firm equality of individuals.
On national level, this is advantageous in two manners. In one of which, those outstanding workers are the leading force in regional GDP boost. National economic growth depends largely upon individuals’ capability in generating incomes. For this reason, the more wealthy people are, the greater the economy of that country is. Second, high salaries usually come with proportional productivity at work. As workers are given a high wage level, general production activities may also see the similarly good outcomes. In final calculation, countries benefit massively in different ways from this.
However, immensely high salaries in actual fact may cause disparities regarding inner sectors of organizations. The budget for human resources is limited to a certain extent; by saving more for a specifically prioritized group, the others have to receive sequential low salary or else firms have to cut down on personnel. The latter circumstance is not really advisable as a potential increase in unemployment rate represents a threat to a country. Because of this, there should be a balanced estimation in paying mechanism to accurately ensure who should be more well-paid, and how much should that peak to not affect other parts of the labor forces.
In conclusion, although the positives that sizeable incomes bring to a country is considerable, equality for others should also be considerated while greatly promoting right people who excel in work.
- Research shows that consumers are less and less influenced by tv and newspaper advertisements than in the past Why is this happening Is it a positive or negative development 96
- In many countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country Others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
... However, immensely high salaries in actual fact may cause disparities regarding inner s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, really, regarding, second, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40972222222 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00603816212 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9224419181 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.866666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285333767116 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774170190819 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556218354352 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155452141364 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192709186291 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.