Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the fast-paced era, the use of sophisticated technology is increasing. To some people, it makes society closer to each other but some assume the opposite. There are some arguments of both views and my perspective which will be elaborated below.
The proponents of this argue that the use of the modern technology, social media, could scope and be connected to people around the world. Consequently, people who live in other countries could communicate with their families without limitation. A good illustration of this is that by using Instagram or facebook, the most used social media platforms, people could also be in contact with others even though their relatives live in other places to keep communication continuous. Another strong reason is that transportation development which is more and more advanced could possibly migrate people from one place to other places quickly by offering affordable price. This makes people able to meet their families without having long-time trip to turn up. For example, To keep their chemistry among family, people prefer using airplane as their main transport to visit their relatives in other cities or countries in short time because airplane companies sometimes offer promo ticket to attract the customers as well.
The opponents of this assume that the increasing use of social media makes people addicted and seldom perform interaction to others. This reduces people’s communication skill because they think having some conversation with others is not as interesting as being on social media. Thus, they often stay in their room and have less interaction with others. Moreover, the machine replacement in some industries could affect people’s interpersonal communication. According to this, people usually talking to others to find out some information should speak to a machine to answer people’s question. Taken as example, customer service no longer exists in some industries because people often ask the repetitive questions to answer their question so that company replaces it by using machine.
In conclusion, despite some appearing drawbacks, in my perspective, by using modern technologies -social media and transport- people could still be connected each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-07 | ieltsstudent | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | ieltsstudent | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Hoang Minh | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | pris | 95 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | sanimergill | 67 | view |
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The internet has transformed lives and economies but it is turning the world into a global village Soon everybody will think and behave in the same way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills To what extent do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...lopment which is more and more advanced could possibly migrate people from one place to other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48985507246 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86890052322 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559420289855 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1783684404 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252052599622 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952356660902 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407485723122 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165529191642 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239901120384 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.