The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy, and Australia between 1995 and 2005.
The provided line chart gives information about the spending on books in four countries which are Germany, Italy, France, and Australia in the period from 1995 to 2005.
From an overall perspective, it is clear that the expenditure on books grew differently in each country but Germany stayed highest for the entire surveyed decade.
In 1995, Germany’s budget for books was significantly higher than the other three counterparts, with 80 million US dollars. Whereas, France and Italy spent nearly the same amount on books, reaching 55 million US dollars and 50 million US dollars respectively. Australia was the lowest spender for books with 30 million US dollars.
From 1995 to 2005, the highest figure which was Germany, underwent a short-term decrease, dropping to 85 million in 2003 before reaching 95 million at the end of the period. French spending on books rose by 20 million in a decade and ranged for the second highest country in the whole period. It was not until 2001 did the data for Australia soared, exceeding Italy in 2003 to become the third-highest figure in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | queanh | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Australia between 1995 and 2005 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 89
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02762430939 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67890292157 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6106686895 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216854310015 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963124611337 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350540254287 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125306182663 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387504028232 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.