The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table gives information about the change in the percentage of attendants allocated to four secondary school types which are Specialist Schools, Grammar Schools, Voluntary-controlled Schools, and Community Schools over years.
From an overall perspective, it is clearly seen that the percentage of students who choose to attend Community Schools increased significantly. Meanwhile, a reverse pattern could be seen in the rest of the school types.
In 2000, Voluntary-controlled schools were the most preferable option as there was 52% of students chose to attend this school, followed by the figure for Grammar Schools with 24%. Specialist Schools and Community Schools shared the same lowest percentage which was 12%.
However, the period between 2000 and 2009 witnessed significant growth in the percentage of Community Schools attendants, reaching 32% in 2005 and 58% in 2009 which was the highest number compared to that of others. As a result, the percentage of attendants in the rest of the schools experienced a decline and the most outstanding data was 18% belonging to Voluntary-controlled Schools.
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 84
- Humans are damaging the environment What problems can this create What are some solutions 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55294117647 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41660913671 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570588235294 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3447047906 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16793170435 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817350243533 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041524032755 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109756122418 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358997361069 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.