In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
In the modern society today, it is easily observed the emergence of a new tendency in which residents of metropolitan regions often opt for living by themselves or in nuclear families in lieu of multigenerational family units. In my perspective, albeit this trend has some benefits, I believe that also goes along with some negative impacts, and this essay below will outline them.
On the one hand, there are a few advantages for people to get when they live alone or in a small family. Firstly, the young will have good conditions to update themselves. For example, it is easy to see that many students nowadays choose to stay away from their home for pursuing their education, as a result they have to be independent and confident since they can no longer depend on their parents to take care of them or give them tips to make their decisions in daily life that they have to do those by themselves. Freedom is also a popular reason why people like this form of life because you would be able to eat anywhere, let their living zone untidy or do whatever they want without facing constant judgment or criticism. Furthermore, many long-lived people do not wish to live the hectic, fast-paced lifestyle in hustle and bustle cities and prefer to live a slower-paced, peaceful, healthier lifestyle in the countryside during the rest of their time.
On the other hand, this trend also brings several drawbacks. First of all, the old often suffer from diseases such as heart attack or mental problems, and by living alone, they are in the absence of the care and attention from their children that is really dangerous. Secondly, children will have less interaction and influence from their grandparents, and potentially miss out on important life lessons from their grandparents who have lots of valuable life experience. In addition to that, crucial tradition and customs may also lost from generation to generation. Finally, solo living, or in a small family groups can lead to poor family bonds between generations.
In conclusion, the shrink of household size is accompanied by both merits and demerits. Personally, I have faith in this tendency carries disadvantages rather than advantages.
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The chart below give information about the highspeed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 89
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 73
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cites in the same week in May 2007 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99455040872 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80009047151 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602179836512 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4242576869 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.928571429 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6428571429 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186257578649 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638774686437 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620238935478 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100729158439 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482736767248 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99455040872 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80009047151 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602179836512 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4242576869 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.928571429 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6428571429 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186257578649 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638774686437 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620238935478 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100729158439 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482736767248 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.