Today, people are getting greedy and selfish. Some people argue that we should go back to old days, and show respect for the family and community, so that we can make the world a better place to live.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The tendency towards being self-centered and covetous has become so obvious to a point that many believe the old values of family and community should be revived. I think this idea is particularly valid in today’s world, as the two aforementioned vices can deteriorate interpersonal relationships dramatically.
the rise of egotism has profound consequences on the unity of a family. In the past, whenever an individual was confronted with an issue, the first ones they would seek counsel from were undoubtedly their siblings or parents. And this indicates a fact that not only famlies can provide a person with tangible benefits, such as financial aid, but also moral support from which one is able to regain confidence, self-esteem and obtain emotional strengthen. Therefore, were one to forego the benefit of being an integral part his family and primarily focus self-interest, the family solidarity would be detrimentally affected. And gradually, family members will probably treat each other as a stranger.
Furthermore, it is readily apparent that avarice is a disruptive influence to the well-being of a community. this is simply due to the fact that greed, if not curbed properly, can become immoderate that it can induce people to engage in unlawful activites for their gain. For example, a greedy local merchant will feel no qualm of plying his low-quality wares or cajoling gullible consumers into buying what they do not actually need. More significantly, once greediness become prevalent in a community, individuals will likely become indifferent to others’ interests and feelings, which means relationships will certainly become superficial and transient, and mainly function on an ad hoc basis. It is safe to say that the barring of help and social solidarity will be inevitable if nothing can be done to decrease the overwhelming selfishness.
In conclusion, greediness and egotism are playing a strong role in the elimination of bond between people not only in a community but also a family. Hence, it is imperative to reconstruct the ethos of sharing and caring which was widely available in past society.
- Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Keeping animals in the zoo is the best way to protect wild animals Do you agree or disagree 78
- some believe that Increasing travels between countries enables people to learn different cultures However others think this can increase tension between people from different countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...personal relationships dramatically. the rise of egotism has profound consequenc...
^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...uence to the well-being of a community. this is simply due to the fact that greed, i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30973451327 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11934314969 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616519174041 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6734746281 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12514760994 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397179801962 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387288688753 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078146279706 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330981362386 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.